Latest News

Home/Latest News

FDAR Attorneys Win Jury Trial in U.S. District Court

Congratulations to FDAR attorneys Daniel T. Downey and Melanie J. Williamson who recently won a jury trial in United States District Court in the Southern District of Ohio on behalf of two Butler County Sheriff’s Corrections Officers. Corey Williams v. Derrick Collins, et al., 1:15-cv-00337 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 17, 2017). Plaintiff, while in the process [...]

2023-11-14T13:03:44-05:00October 17th, 2017|Latest News, Newsletter, Trial Successes|

DOJ Takes Stance that Title VII Does Not Prohibit Sexual Orientation Discrimination

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), under the Trump administration, recently argued that that Title VII of the Civil Rights act of 1964 does not protect workers from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. The DOJ and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) had previously taken the position that Title VII’s language regarding discrimination [...]

2017-10-24T13:29:14-04:00October 17th, 2017|Latest News, Newsletter|

Federal Court Dismisses “Knock and Talk” Case Against County

FHKAD attorneys Dan Downey and Paul Bernhart recently received summary judgment for a County and its Sheriff Deputies in a lawsuit alleging an unlawful search and seizure in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The case involved a “knock and talk” operation conducted by the Fairfield County Sheriff’s Office SCRAP (“Street Crime Reduction and [...]

2017-10-24T13:29:15-04:00October 17th, 2017|Latest News, Newsletter|

Revised I-9 Employment Eligibility Form

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released a revised I-9 Employment Eligibility Form on July 17, 2017. The changes are mostly minor, including additions to the List of Acceptable Documents on the I-9 Form. Employers were required to switch to this revised form by September 18, 2017. The revised form can be found at: [...]

2017-10-24T13:29:15-04:00October 17th, 2017|Latest News, Newsletter|

Court Questions EEOC Final Rules Regarding Wellness Programs

Wellness programs have become popular in many work places in the last several years as a means of promoting employee health and reducing healthcare costs. A federal district court recently evaluated the validity of an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) rule dealing with incentives – financial or otherwise – that may be offered to employees [...]

2017-10-24T13:29:15-04:00October 17th, 2017|Latest News, Newsletter|

Federal Court Grants Summary Judgment to Fairfield County Sheriff’s Office in Search and Seizure Case

FHKAD attorneys Dan Downey and Paul Bernhart recently received summary judgment on behalf of the Fairfield County Sheriff’s Office in a lawsuit alleging an unlawful search and seizure in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. Plaintiffs filed the lawsuit against the Fairfield County Commissioners, Fairfield County Sheriff’s Office and several law enforcement officers. The [...]

2017-10-24T13:29:15-04:00September 21st, 2017|Latest News|

Revised I-9 Employment Eligibility Form

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released a revised I-9 Employment Eligibility Form on July 17, 2017.  The changes are mostly minor, including additions to the List of Acceptable Documents on the I-9 Form.  Employers must switch to this revised form by September 18, 2017.  The revised form can be found at: https://www.uscis.gov/i-9.  Employers should review [...]

2017-10-24T13:29:15-04:00August 22nd, 2017|Latest News|

Is Past Practice a Practice of the Past?

Employers may want to think twice before relying on past practice as the basis for disciplinary action. In Ohio Patrolmen’s Benevolent Assn. v. Findlay, the Ohio Supreme Court concluded in its 6-1 decision that “[a]ny limitation on an arbitrator’s authority to modify a disciplinary action pursuant to a CBA provision requiring that discipline be imposed [...]

2017-10-24T13:29:15-04:00July 13th, 2017|Latest News, Newsletter|

Sixth Circuit Affirms Employer’s Affirmative Defense to Sexual Harassment Liability

Last month, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed that AutoZone was not vicariously liable for a store manager’s sexual harassment of his co-workers. The Sixth Circuit also held that AutoZone established an affirmative defense to the claim. In EEOC v. AutoZone, Inc., it was alleged that AutoZone subjected female employees to [...]

2017-10-24T13:29:15-04:00July 13th, 2017|Latest News, Newsletter|